Sunday, April 08, 2007

Who's Withholding

There Bush goes again. Someone, usually Democrats, questions his so-called plans for fighting what he likes to think of as global terrorism. Instead of responding to the questions, the traitor-in-chief and his lackeys identify whoever questioned the plans as the enemy: "Why do you hate America?" "Why don't you support our troops?" It's the traitor-in-chief's ignorance at work. Like every other member of criminal family, he believes that as emperor, he does not have to answer questions. He's simply too stupid to understand democracy, which is not a terribly difficult concept to grasp.
Now he says that if the Congress doesn't give him an emergency spending bill to pursue his imperialist aims in the Middle East, they will be denying the troops in Iraq the goods they need to carry on his illegal occupation. Let's get the sequence straight. The traitor-in-chief asked Congress for new emergency appropriations, not realizing that his lackeys were no longer running the legislative branch. The legislators considered his request and came to the conclusion that it was a bad idea to give a traitor who spends like a drunken sailor money without imposing conditions. They voted to give him the funding he requested, but they demanded accountability, something that the traitor-in-chief doesn't grasp. Essentially, their message came down to this: "Here's your money, but you'd damn well better end the occupation by a specified date because we're not going to keep handing you more." The part that the traitor-in-chief missed is "Here's your money." Congress met his demands. His role, at that point, was to accept the money and the accountability and, for once is his misbegotten, wasteful, criminal, debauched existence, do his best to achieve goals instead of laughing them off.
He doesn't know how to do that. His bitch mother protected him from the consequences of his mediocrity and substance abuse. Karl Rove protected him from the consequences of his incompetence and corruption. And what hurts most is the idea that the Secret Service has already indicated that it will cost more to protect him than any other former president simply because he has aroused such hatred around the world. I've got a terrific idea: No more for him than for any other former president. Let the bastard barricade himself on his ranch in Texas so that the security costs stay low. No one is going to want him to be an elder statesman anyway, and if I were Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton, I damn sure wouldn't want him and his whore wife at my funeral.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home